|
|
Post by Sean™ on Apr 26, 2009 6:34:14 GMT -5
hanley hits 30 hr's 100 rbi .... 20ERRORS and maybe 20-30 stolen bases
jose hits 15-20hr's....... 50-75rbi...... 2-5ERRORS and maybe 50-60 stolen
|
|
|
|
Post by xnickx5757 on Apr 26, 2009 7:42:14 GMT -5
so jose is the better SS?
|
|
|
|
Post by Martin55 on Apr 26, 2009 8:44:17 GMT -5
jose is a better shortstop, but hanley is a better hitter
|
|
|
|
Post by Martin55 on Apr 26, 2009 8:44:46 GMT -5
jose is also more exciting to watch
|
|
|
|
Post by yagottabelieve on Apr 26, 2009 11:38:18 GMT -5
jose no doubt. hanley is a power hitter for being a shortstop. shortstops are mainly game changing leadoff hitters not 30hr 100rbi clean up hitters
|
|
|
|
Post by Sean™ on Apr 26, 2009 12:54:17 GMT -5
yup
|
|
|
|
Post by wykaman92 on Apr 26, 2009 12:56:17 GMT -5
yeah pretty much.
|
|
|
|
Post by yagottabelieve on Apr 26, 2009 13:15:18 GMT -5
its true
|
|
|
|
Post by Martin55 on Apr 26, 2009 18:42:01 GMT -5
thats y hanley is better because not many shortstops are 30hr 100rbi guys and that makes him great
|
|
|
|
Post by yagottabelieve on Apr 26, 2009 19:35:48 GMT -5
no that makes him a panzy. hes the next barry bonds.
|
|
|
|
Post by metman1216 on Apr 26, 2009 22:46:18 GMT -5
ouch. thats a good one. but like ygb said earlier: ss arent generally power hitters, theyre the game changers. simple as that
|
|
|
|
Post by And1™ on Apr 26, 2009 23:02:29 GMT -5
ya but hanley is power hitter too!
which defiantly changes games.
thats what makes him great.
|
|
|
|
Post by yagottabelieve on Apr 27, 2009 14:55:05 GMT -5
not at all. he is a very streaky hitter. he'll do well and he'll do bad. reyes is consistent. also hanley isnt good in the field
|
|
|
|
Post by Martin55 on Apr 27, 2009 15:41:01 GMT -5
yes he is typical of a mets fan to say that jose is better just like they say that wright is better than arod
|
|
|
|
Post by Martin55 on Apr 27, 2009 15:41:35 GMT -5
and ygb ur a retard, hanley is never gonna be a barry bonds
|
|
